Party Now, Apocalypse Later Industries

Where creativity went when it said it was going out for cigarettes.
  • Home
  • BOOKS
    • THE ONCE AND FUTURE ORSON WELLES
    • IF ANY OF THESE STORIES GOES OVER 1000 WORDS...
    • ORSON WELLES OF MARS
    • THE DEVIL LIVES IN BEVERLY HILLS
    • A LOSS FOR NORMALCY
    • RIGHT - A NOVEL OF POLITICS
  • PODCASTS
    • Beyond the Cabin in the Woods
    • THE HOLODECK IS BROKEN
    • THE FOURTH WALL
    • As The Myth Turns
    • FRIENDIBALS! - TWO FRIENDS TALKING ABOUT HANNIBAL LECTER
    • DISORGANIZED! A Criminal Minds Podcast
  • MOVIE REVIEWS
  • BLOGS AND MORE
    • Bloggy B Bloggington III, DDS
    • THE HOLODECK IS BROKEN BLOG
    • REALLY GOOD MAN!
  • Home
    • THE ONCE AND FUTURE ORSON WELLES
    • IF ANY OF THESE STORIES GOES OVER 1000 WORDS...
    • ORSON WELLES OF MARS
    • THE DEVIL LIVES IN BEVERLY HILLS
    • A LOSS FOR NORMALCY
    • RIGHT - A NOVEL OF POLITICS
    • Beyond the Cabin in the Woods
    • THE HOLODECK IS BROKEN
    • THE FOURTH WALL
    • As The Myth Turns
    • FRIENDIBALS! - TWO FRIENDS TALKING ABOUT HANNIBAL LECTER
    • DISORGANIZED! A Criminal Minds Podcast
  • MOVIE REVIEWS
    • Bloggy B Bloggington III, DDS
    • THE HOLODECK IS BROKEN BLOG
    • REALLY GOOD MAN!

A Blog About Watching Movies (AKA a Blog in Search of a Better Title)

Ten Nights in a Barroom (1926)

Mac Boyle February 16, 2024

Director: Roy Calnek

Cast: Charles Gilpin, Lawrence Chenault, Myra Burwell, Harry Henderson

Have I Seen it Before: Never. It was an odd screening, to be sure, filled as it was with members of the Tulsa Spotlight Theater, who have been staging The Drunkard—Ten Nights and The Drunkard are apparently based on the same source material—non-stop for seventy years. They had a certain keying into the film that I probably wouldn’t be able to lay claim to unless I spent several decade living with the story like it was a member of the family.

Did I Like It: Not exceptionally. The story was sufficiently bland that it probably guaranteed I would never go voluntarily to the Spotlight. The filming techniques on display are competent, but unremarkable. When the film isn’t being boring or cloying, it certainly is being moralistic about alcohol. During prohibition, I get why that would be the milieu, but the moment the Twenty-First amendment was ratified, the entire film becomes quaint.

But the fact that the film company behind it was committed to presenting African Americans on film in any way other than degrading minstrel cliche at a time mere minutes away from events like the Tulsa Race Massacre is endlessly fascinating. Away from the then-cottage industry sprouting up in Los Angeles, and making films that would only appeal to a small part of the population, and might horrifically infuriate the parts of the population that aren’t interested in seeing it? It’s not hard to imagine that the company only survived to make four films before folding. Failure might have been inevitable with all of those factors working against them, but the grit that caused them to try and the struggle to continue onward until they simply couldn’t manage it anymore?

Isn’t that the real movie we need to be watching?

Tagsten nights in a baroom (1926), roy calnek, charles gilpin, lawrence chenault, myra burwell, harry henderson
  • A Blog About Watching Movies (AKA a Blog in Search of a Better Title)
  • Older
  • Newer

Powered by Squarespace

Party Now, Apocalypse Later Industries

Where creativity went when it said it was going out for cigarettes.

Where creativity went when it said it was going out for cigarettes.