Party Now, Apocalypse Later Industries

Where creativity went when it said it was going out for cigarettes.
  • Home
  • BOOKS
    • THE ONCE AND FUTURE ORSON WELLES
    • IF ANY OF THESE STORIES GOES OVER 1000 WORDS...
    • ORSON WELLES OF MARS
    • THE DEVIL LIVES IN BEVERLY HILLS
    • A LOSS FOR NORMALCY
    • RIGHT - A NOVEL OF POLITICS
  • PODCASTS
    • Beyond the Cabin in the Woods
    • THE HOLODECK IS BROKEN
    • THE FOURTH WALL
    • As The Myth Turns
    • FRIENDIBALS! - TWO FRIENDS TALKING ABOUT HANNIBAL LECTER
    • DISORGANIZED! A Criminal Minds Podcast
  • MOVIE REVIEWS
  • BLOGS AND MORE
    • Bloggy B Bloggington III, DDS
    • THE HOLODECK IS BROKEN BLOG
    • REALLY GOOD MAN!
  • Home
    • THE ONCE AND FUTURE ORSON WELLES
    • IF ANY OF THESE STORIES GOES OVER 1000 WORDS...
    • ORSON WELLES OF MARS
    • THE DEVIL LIVES IN BEVERLY HILLS
    • A LOSS FOR NORMALCY
    • RIGHT - A NOVEL OF POLITICS
    • Beyond the Cabin in the Woods
    • THE HOLODECK IS BROKEN
    • THE FOURTH WALL
    • As The Myth Turns
    • FRIENDIBALS! - TWO FRIENDS TALKING ABOUT HANNIBAL LECTER
    • DISORGANIZED! A Criminal Minds Podcast
  • MOVIE REVIEWS
    • Bloggy B Bloggington III, DDS
    • THE HOLODECK IS BROKEN BLOG
    • REALLY GOOD MAN!

A Blog About Watching Movies (AKA a Blog in Search of a Better Title)

Super Mario Bros. (1993)

Mac Boyle August 10, 2023

Director: Rocky Morton, Annabel Jankel

 

Cast: Bob Hoskins, John Leguizamo, Dennis Hopper, Samantha Mathis

 

Have I Seen It Before: I’m not 100% sure, but I think I may have seen it twice in the theater. I may be the only person living, or to have lived (including the cast and filmmakers, one would imagine) to have seen it in the theater twice. It was somehow on my—I was all of eight—radar to insist we go see the movie, despite the commercials screaming—even to an eight-year-old—that there was something not quite right about the film. Then, when a friend’s mom decided to try and stem the tide of summer exhaustion with a trip to the theater, I went again, because even then I’d rather be at the movies than almost anywhere else. That’s still true.

 

Then I remember becoming absolutely fixated on renting the movie and seeing it again when it was released on video later that year. I can’t remember why I might have done this, because I wasn’t all that thrilled with the movie even back then. It may have been a direct result of someone  in the school cafeteria insisting that Disney/Hollywood Pictures (or, the monolithic “they” as we would have called it then) was absolutely, without a doubt going to make a sequel, because the people that make movies don’t include the <Back to the Future (1985)> ending.

 

As it turns out, I’ve probably seen this film too many times.

 

Did I Like It: Making a good movie is a mysterious alchemy. It’s a massive undertaking, where the majority of the intricate pieces involved have to be either simultaneously or in precise coordination at the top of their game, and if the marketing isn’t right, no one may see the damned thing. The one thing that I think probably has to happen is that the people involved have to want to be there*. Bob Hoskins and John Leguizamo don’t want to be there, but to dip one’s toe in the trivia associated with the train wreck production knows that they were sufficiently lubricated to work through their displeasure. They emerge from the film as genial presences, and we can commiserate with their plight in being in the movie while we are forcing ourselves to watch it. And yet, one can’t help but marvel at the alternate universe—where’s a massive meteor when you need one?—where Tom Hanks nearly played Mario, but was passed on as he wasn’t at that time the kind of box office draw that they could get out of Hoskins.

Dennis Hopper, on the other hand, just spends the film looking angrily confused, screaming “plumbers,” “fungus,” and “meteor” in alternating combinations.

Maybe Hoskins and Leguizamo should have offered him a drink. If everyone had been sloshed, we all might have gotten into the cheap (emphasis on cheap) riff on <Blade Runner (1982)> or <Total Recall (1990)>. Instead, things seem as off as they did when I was eight.

Then again, my usual standard for a good adaptation of a pre-existing property is that it makes me want to take in the original source material. I’m fairly sure that each and every time I’ve seen the movie, I’ve wanted to play one of the Mario games, if only to wash the taste out of my mouth**.

 

 

*Sure, a movie like Casino Royale (1967) is filled with overpaid, overly relaxed people, and is perhaps the dictionary definition of a train wreck and by all accounts Bill Murray would have preferred to be eaten alive by wildebeests than continue shooting <Groundhog Day (1993)>, but these exceptions would have to be unusual bordering on unique.

**In the movies defense, we were sufficiently inoculated from having to force ourselves to try and play a terrible SNES game adapted from the movie.

Tags super mario bros. (1993), rocky morton, annabel jankel, bob hoskins, john leguizamo, dennis hopper, samantha mathis
Comment

Mermaids (1990)

Mac Boyle January 8, 2022

Director: Richard Benjamin

Cast: Cher, Bob Hoskins, Winona Ryder, Christina Ricci

Have I Seen it Before: Never. It’s been one of those movies which Lora counted as her favorite and put an APB on picking it up if I ever found it on one of my prolonged DVD hunts. Coming up short, I eventually caved and ordered off of Amazon. Not how I normally like to procure my movies—there is something in the hunt I always enjoy—but here we are.

Did I Like It: There are some comedies which are powered entirely by how we feel about spending time with the characters. The story is meaningless, basically, but if we like the characters, everything works out okay for us the audience.

Here is the plot of Mermaids: A single woman and her two daughters move to a new town. The oldest becomes infatuated with a local boy, and kisses him. Because of this, the younger child falls into water and is injured. Everyone survives.

Not much, right? And that’s compounded by the fact that the majority of that synopsis takes place in the last thirty minutes or so, and doesn’t include Lou (Hoskins), one of the lead… because he has very little impact on the film itself. But the characters are quirky enough, and likable enough, and performed well enough, and there’s more than a few deep, sustained belly laughs in the film (“We’re Jewish…”) that everything works out okay for me. I enjoyed my time with them, and in all honesty, I screened the film about a week ago, and I haven’t been able to get Jimmy Soul out of my head most of the time. That has to count for something, right?

But one thing that continues to bug me, aside from parsing out Jimmy Soul’s lyrics. Why the hell is film called Mermaids? I mean, yes, I get Cher’s costume… And the fact that Christina Ricci is intermittently a good swimmer… But aside from that? Winona Ryder is pointedly un-Mermaid, and it feels like she is the main character.

Maybe someone else can explain it to me real slow.

Tags mermaids (1990), richard benjamin, cher, bob hoskins, winona ryder, christina ricci
Comment
220px-Movie_poster_who_framed_roger_rabbit.jpg

Who Framed Roger Rabbit (1988)

Mac Boyle July 11, 2020

Director: Robert Zemeckis

 

Cast: Bob Hoskins, Christopher Lloyd, Charles Fleischer, Stubby Kaye

 

Have I Seen it Before: I’m a child of the 1990s and I had a VCR. What do you think?

 

Did I Like It: One would naturally want to dwell in this review on the technology on display here. Animated characters had interacted with live action performances before, in films like Song of the South (1946) and Mary Poppins (1964) (both from Disney, incidentally). However, they never interacted quite so believably before or since. Animated characters rustle through their environment. Water splashes, blinds rustle, and chairs rotate when they come in contact with Roger and company. It’s a subtle, relatively low-tech addition to the process, but adds so much.

 

This is also a baffling cross-corporation crossover. When would you ever see Donald and Daffy Duck play a duet on the piano? Or Mickey Mouse and Bugs Bunny engage in conversation? Or any character owned by Warner Bros. appearing within 100 miles of a Disney production? It’s a testament to the baffling things Steven Spielberg could get done with just the weight of his mere involvement in a movie. I can’t imagine that such a convergence could ever happen again. It’s probably for the best that any sequel—variously rumored to be a war movie, or a domestic drama with Roger (Fleischer) and Jessica (various performers depending on the context, but primarily Kathleen Turner) in the 1950s—never came together.

 

Other movies attempted to fit a similar mold in the ensuing years. Cool World (1992), Space Jam (1996), and Looney Tunes: Back in Action (2003) all tried to merge real people and cartoon characters to varying degrees of commercial and critical success. Why do those films disappear into ambivalence and this film stands the test of time? Honestly, the story that underlines the whole thing (a tale about a private eye uncovering a plot to eradicate LA’s public transit system in favor of the freeway that will inevitably take it over) actually works under its own merits. The character work is solid. It may all be in the mold of Chinatown (1974), but it doesn’t skimp in the craft department simply because it is an homage.

Tags who framed roger rabbit (1988), robert zemeckis, bob hoskins, christopher lloyd, charles fleischer, stubby kaye
Comment

Powered by Squarespace

Party Now, Apocalypse Later Industries

Where creativity went when it said it was going out for cigarettes.

Where creativity went when it said it was going out for cigarettes.