Party Now, Apocalypse Later Industries

Where creativity went when it said it was going out for cigarettes.
  • Home
  • BOOKS
    • THE ONCE AND FUTURE ORSON WELLES
    • IF ANY OF THESE STORIES GOES OVER 1000 WORDS...
    • ORSON WELLES OF MARS
    • THE DEVIL LIVES IN BEVERLY HILLS
    • A LOSS FOR NORMALCY
    • RIGHT - A NOVEL OF POLITICS
  • PODCASTS
    • Beyond the Cabin in the Woods
    • THE HOLODECK IS BROKEN
    • THE FOURTH WALL
    • As The Myth Turns
    • FRIENDIBALS! - TWO FRIENDS TALKING ABOUT HANNIBAL LECTER
    • DISORGANIZED! A Criminal Minds Podcast
  • MOVIE REVIEWS
  • BLOGS AND MORE
    • Bloggy B Bloggington III, DDS
    • THE HOLODECK IS BROKEN BLOG
    • REALLY GOOD MAN!
  • Home
    • THE ONCE AND FUTURE ORSON WELLES
    • IF ANY OF THESE STORIES GOES OVER 1000 WORDS...
    • ORSON WELLES OF MARS
    • THE DEVIL LIVES IN BEVERLY HILLS
    • A LOSS FOR NORMALCY
    • RIGHT - A NOVEL OF POLITICS
    • Beyond the Cabin in the Woods
    • THE HOLODECK IS BROKEN
    • THE FOURTH WALL
    • As The Myth Turns
    • FRIENDIBALS! - TWO FRIENDS TALKING ABOUT HANNIBAL LECTER
    • DISORGANIZED! A Criminal Minds Podcast
  • MOVIE REVIEWS
    • Bloggy B Bloggington III, DDS
    • THE HOLODECK IS BROKEN BLOG
    • REALLY GOOD MAN!

A Blog About Watching Movies (AKA a Blog in Search of a Better Title)

Romeo + Juliet (1996)

Mac Boyle June 4, 2022

Director: Baz Luhrmann

Cast: Leonardo DiCaprio, Claire Danes, Harold Perrineau, John Leguizamo

Have I Seen it Before: I can say with certainty that couple with being alive and conscious in the 1990s, and having HBO for most of that time, I had plenty of opportunities to see the movie. Ultimately, owing probably due to a measure of unavoidable—but able to be shed—adolescent chauvinism, I don’t think I got much of anywhere past the scene where Romeo (DiCaprio) first lays eyes on Juliet (Danes).

Did I Like It: A Shakespeare adaptation is about the easiest thing not to screw up, sort of like the dramatic equivalent of boxed Mac & Cheese in the food world. As such, it can be the purview of the profoundly lazy. Dress everyone up in period-specific attire, don’t futz with the script too much (it’s got to help that Shakespeare can’t bring a case to arbitration with the WGA), and you even get bonus credit if you just copy and paste the full text and make us sit there for four hours.

But really, you should get even more credit for fitting the expansive scope of any one of his plays into a manageable running time.

This would count then, wouldn’t it?

Real credit, though, should be given when a Shakespearean adaptation reaches for the Orson Welles standard and tries to make that text work in a context that feels closer to the audience for which it is intended. One could have just put DiCaprio (who, let’s face it, has more interesting work ahead of him after he could sell an army’s worth of tickets with just his face alone) in the role and called it a day. Actually giving a MTV-obsessed generation some identification with the material, all the way to the point where the various Montagues and Capulets might have been equally at home in a season of The Real World as in Verona (or Verona Beach), would have made Welles—and quite possibly the bard himself—proud.

This doesn’t even begin to cover the delightful, anarchic absurdism at the core of any Luhrmann work, does it?

Tagsromeo + juliet (1996), baz luhrmann, leonardo dicaprio, claire danes, harold perrineau, john leguizamo
  • A Blog About Watching Movies (AKA a Blog in Search of a Better Title)
  • Older
  • Newer

Powered by Squarespace

Party Now, Apocalypse Later Industries

Where creativity went when it said it was going out for cigarettes.

Where creativity went when it said it was going out for cigarettes.